5
" Is drawing near to speech, speaking, seeing, thinking oresently, rediscovering speech, vision, thoughts which are vertical (=abyssal) a 'mysticism' without God? Coincidence? No: it is not extraphilosophical, coincidence with an unsayable, an external ineffable. All of speculation is necessary in order to discover a sense for this prespeculative Being. But what will we say about it? Everything that we will say about it will be in principle false. Silence? There really would be indirect language...which would not try to objectify the said, but which gives it through gestures = poetry--And we could generalize: history, life, Passions. But then philosophy replaced by art, poetry, life? No, because they speak only silently. Philosophy as the thematization of this speaking silence. "
― Maurice Merleau-Ponty , Husserl at the Limits of Phenomenology
10
" As a speaking and active subject I encroach upon the other who is listening, as the understanding and passive subject I allow the other to encroach upon me. Within myself, in the exercise of language, I experience activity each time as the other side of passivity. And it is thus that ideality 'makes its entrance.' No more in my relationship than in my relationship to others is there any question of survey or of pure ideality. There is, however, the overlapping of a passivity by an activity: that is how I think within the other person and how I talk with myself. Speech is not a product of my active thought, standing in a secondary relation to it. It is my practice, my operation, my 'Funktion,' my destiny. Every spiritual production is a response and an appeal, a coproduction. "
― Maurice Merleau-Ponty , Husserl at the Limits of Phenomenology