Home > Work > Double Toil and Gender Trouble? Performativity and Femininity in the Cauldron of Esotericism Research

Double Toil and Gender Trouble? Performativity and Femininity in the Cauldron of Esotericism Research QUOTES

Double Toil and Gender Trouble? Performativity and Femininity in the Cauldron of Esotericism Research QUOTES

1 " The assumption that femininity is always structured by and performed for a male gaze fails to take seriously queer feminine desire. The radical feminist critiques of femininity also disregarded the fact that not all who are (seen as) feminine are women. Crucially, what is viewed as appropriately feminine is not only defined in relation to maleness or masculinity, but through numerous intersections of power including race, sexuality, ability, and social class. In other words, white, heterosexual, binary gender-conforming, able-bodied, and upper- or middle-class femininity is privileged in relation to other varieties. Any social system may contain multiple femininities that differ in status, and which relate to each other as well as to masculinity. As highlighted by “effeminate” gay men, trans women, femmes, drag queens, and “bad girls,” it is possible to be perceived as excessively, insufficiently, or wrongly feminine without for that sake being seen as masculine. Finally, the view of femininity as a restrictive yet disposable mask presupposes that emancipation entails departure into neutral (or masculine) modes of being. This is a tenuous assumption, as the construction of selfhood is entangled with gender, and conceptions of androgyny and gender neutrality similarly hinge on culturally specific ideas of masculinity and femininity. "

― , Double Toil and Gender Trouble? Performativity and Femininity in the Cauldron of Esotericism Research